Assange is a damaged character, not just because of his comparatively recent Wikileaks brainchild, but possibly because of how his entire life has unfolded - partly by design, partly by circumstance.
He is currently on Interpol's most wanted list, has a warrant for arrest in Sweden, and is denounced by his native Australia and has been told he faces criminal charges if he returns. As if that's not enough, he has served a spell in prison for hacking, was in hiding with his mother during his teenage years due to custody battles, and then faced another custody battle over his own child in the late 1990's.
He undoubtedly has a phenomenal mind, and this is paired with what often comes across as an awkward and geeky manner. This interview with him on TED shows both of these qualities in abundance.
None of this is news, but I'd like to posit two theories about why he keeps going, and why this is endearing to so many.
First, why he keeps going. In one of the many films named 'Damaged' (I think it's this one) there's the quotation that forms the title of this post. It's hard for us to empathise with Assange, but there must come a point at which you feel so embattled that it becomes a way of life, and if you're tough enough you can focus the adrenaline energy into doing something positive (he and his mother formed a group called 'Parent Inquiry into Child Protection' that helped people access legal files about child custody issues had hitherto remained beyond their grasp).
That, mated with a potent cocktail of hacking ability and a putative knowledge of philosophy and neuroscience, could easily be seen to make him think that if anyone's going to effect change, they're not going to be much better prepared than he is.
Perhaps it also becomes an addiction, as the neurotransmitter adrenaline courses through his nerves, resisting sleep and causing restive twitches (both of which his colleagues testify to, although I can't remember where I read this).
And it's all of the above that leads me to why he's so endearing: a sleep-deprived, adrenaline junkie hacker, in hiding from international politicians, fighting for his kid, having led a gypsy childhood, and exposing the tawdry-to-downright-dangerous diplomatic goings-on that governments want to hide.
Move over Stieg Larsson (oops, you already did): this has got more film potential than any of your novels.
1 comment:
V interesting, but not quite sure I agree with your point (or the quote) that 'Damaged people are more dangerous'... many people have many kinds of trauma inflicted upon them. Apart from when you can categorise someone as 'damaged', I also think that few 'become dangerous' as a result. Many simply become more adaptable, if this makes them more dangerous in other people's eyes then that's a whole different bag. Also, different people become more extrospect or introspect after experiencing the same thing... Hmmm... good discussion point.
Post a Comment